SAP holds the authoritative record — inventory, pricing, customers, orders. The problem is rarely SAP itself; it is that the storefront, the dealer portal and the field app each hold their own version of the same data, and the versions disagree.

We build the layer between them. Stock and pricing flow out, orders flow in, and where the two systems genuinely conflict there is defined logic for which one wins rather than whichever wrote last.

With SAP HANA the calculation moves closer to the data, which changes what is worth querying in real time and what should still be cached. We design for that rather than treating it as a faster database.

What this covers

Product, pricing and inventory synchronised to customer-facing systems
Orders passed into SAP with validation before they land
Customer and account master data kept consistent across systems
Real-time and scheduled sync, chosen per data type
Conflict resolution rules for cases where systems disagree
SAP HANA analytics surfaced in operational dashboards
Monitoring and alerting when a sync fails, rather than silent drift

How engagements work

Audit

What each system holds, what it exposes, and where the data already disagrees.
Design

An integration layer that survives either system being upgraded.
Build

Sync in place, plus the tooling to spot drift before your customers do.
Monitor

Alerting on failure, because a silent sync failure is the dangerous kind.